![]() |
| http://www.memecreator.org/meme/honesto-promise |
beLIEve me!
Have you ever NOT lie in one day? By simply saying you feel alright when you're really not, or when you say you don't have an extra coin in your hand when somebody asks though you have more than one, deception has always been running in the nature of a human. In some point of the conversation, people tend to either put more or less sugar in it in order to earn better feedback about oneself.
Interpersonal deception theory never fails to amaze me when it sets itself to the truthfulness of reality. We thought that lying (interpersonal deception as I consider in this article) never gets good results. But guess what subconsciously, we tend to lie in every second that we give ourselves good impact to others in our daily conversations with them.
Believe me -- one of the few universal truths in life is that everybody lies.
-- James Hearnn
Interpersonal deception theory (IDT) arose out of just this concern that deception be examined within the nexus of interpersonal encounters. It was formulated to contextualize an explanation of deceptive communication in what we know about conversation. This
approach stands in contrast to more psychological explanations for deceptive communication. It also draws attention to the dynamic nature of deception displays and to the mutual influence between sender and receiver that occurs in all conversations. (Burgoon, Buller; Interpersonal Deception Theory)
Following the lead of others who study verbal deceit, Buller and Burgoon label these three strategies falsification, concealment, and equivocation. The three differ in that falsification creates a fiction, concealment hides a secret, and equivocation dodges the issue. Yet all three messages fall under the umbrella concept of deception, which Buller and Burgoon define as "a message knowingly transmitted by a sender to foster a false belief or conclusion by the receiver." (Em Griffin, A First Look at Communication Theory)
We tend to add up to something that reality doesn't really have. Whether it's for good or not, we lie for the sake of our self-contentment. And in different ways, deception has always been present in the mouth of a human being. May it be for the appraisal of a friend's work when it's really not as good as you said it to be, it's deception. Creating some untruthful ideas that would please other is just one of the many ways of deception. The hurtful fact that people can't always be true is one major concern of this theory. With Burgoon and Buller explaining and giving more specific examples of deception in an interpersonal communication, it just makes me realize how truth can hurt a bit and lie that can hurt more. It's just so interesting that Burgoon and Buller sited ways on how to detect and decipher deceivers and how to actually be good at it. Nonetheless, even the smallest of all lies can hurt the most. So better keep in mind to always seek for the truth and stick with it, especially in a world full of great deceivers.
References:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x/abstract
http://www.afirstlook.com/docs/interpersdecep.pdf
http://www.mediate.com/articles/hearnj1.cfm

You should've explained the theory in a way not only you wound understand but also the readers of this post. Remember, not all of us (the readers) studied and researched this theory so you better explain it to us without confusing us of it's meaning :)
ReplyDeletePunctuation. I don't know if its just the font but the period and comma appeared to be the same. There's also this confusing sentence because of the improper punctuation and wording.
"But guess what subconsciously, we tend to lie in every second that we give ourselves good impact to others in our daily conversations with them."
Also, I don't know if it's just me or you really didn't critic it piece by piece the way you should. Hmm..
The intro is nice though :3
Oh. sorry about the font, guess i'll change it as soon as i can. But the content, I took it generally and we know I can't change it. I didn't realized that I haven't really explained it bit by bit 'til you noticed. Thanks for that. Love yah! :*
ReplyDeletegamitin na ang tamang format ng citation :)
ReplyDeleteAng laki ng font nakakatuwa! Hindi ako nahirapan magbasa. :)
ReplyDeleteOh ayun, proper citations kulang. Tapos sana, naglagay ka ng mga experience mo or ng ibang tao about this theory kasi for sure may mailalagay ka, maski ako. Lahat naman tayo nakapagsinungaling na o nagsisinungaling. But nonetheless, I love the font size talaga! :)
1
ReplyDeleteKailangan ba talagang may highlight na
violet? Nakakahilo kasi.
2
I have a problem with the construction of your
sentences, too complicated. If you're not
used to using the language, write in Filipino,
its a lot way easier than to confuse your readers
with what you really want to say - because honestly,
I can't understand most of your thoughts (esp. sa mga unang talata) here
just because of its construction.
3
Cite properly please. And avoid lifting quotes
directly.
4
Sobrang daming impormasyon na hindi naman
na kailangan at pwede ng tanggalin.
5
Nice play of words sa titulo! :)
Pwede pa siyang i-compress into a better one. You can still organize your thoughts. Nakakatuwa yung font size. Madaling basahin.
ReplyDelete